Topic summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video891 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Spinoffs results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 43.8% saturation with 1,172 hits. Analysis detected 3,330 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,673 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (4,458 of 16,562 topics). This Spinoffs is worse (more manipulative) than 73.10% of the peer group.
Spinoffs
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,673
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510073.1% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 43.9%43.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.1%3.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 7.6%7.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.5%4.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 43.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.3%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos