Topic summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video654 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Spinal Muscular Atrophy results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 29.2% saturation with 764 hits. Analysis detected 2,897 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,616 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (4,966 of 16,562 topics). This Spinal Muscular Atrophy is worse (more manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group.
Spinal Muscular Atrophy
Topic details
Total words: 2,616
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510070.0% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 21.4%21.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 29.2%29.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.4%14.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 29.2%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 21.4%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos