Topic summary
⁠48%1 analyzed article/video495 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Spent Nuclear Fuel Management results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 337 hits. Analysis detected 1,542 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,980 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,701 of 16,558 topics). This Spent Nuclear Fuel Management is worse (more manipulative) than 65.60% of the peer group.
Spent Nuclear Fuel Management
Topic details
Total words: 1,980
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510065.6% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 17.0%17.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 10.6%10.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.6%3.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 9.1%9.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos