Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Spam Filtering results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 275 hits. Analysis detected 2,053 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,506 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Spam Filtering is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Spam Filtering
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,506
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.4%6.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.5%15.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 18.3%18.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 8.7%8.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 17.2%17.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.4%6.4%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.1%7.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 8.7%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.4%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos