Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Spam Filtering results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Biased Writer Voice , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 275 hits . Analysis detected 2,053 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,506 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Spam Filtering is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Spam Filtering
Topic details
Total words: 1,506
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 15.5% 15.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 18.3% 18.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 17.2% 17.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 8.7%, sitewide 0.8% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.5% Slippery Slope: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.4% Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst