Topic summary
⁠38%2 analyzed articles/videos674 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Spacex Starship Program results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 440 hits. Analysis detected 2,547 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,027 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (8,491 of 16,562 topics). This Spacex Starship Program is better (less manipulative) than 51.30% of the peer group.
Spacex Starship Program
Topic details
Total words: 3,027
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510048.7% percentile
2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.5%14.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.6%12.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.1%11.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Middle Ground: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.1%Indoctrination: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos