Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Space Station results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Recency Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 269 hits. Analysis detected 1,954 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,376 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,984 topics). This Space Station is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Space Station
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,376
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.2%3.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 7.2%7.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.2%, sitewide 0.8%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Recency Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos