Topic summary
⁠12%1 analyzed article/video352 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Space Science results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Indoctrination, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 114 hits. Analysis detected 445 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,056 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (5,061 of 16,562 topics). This Space Science is worse (more manipulative) than 69.40% of the peer group.
Space Science
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,056
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

69% percentile
025507510069.4% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.1%7.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.4%2.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 7.9%7.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 10.8%10.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 0.0%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos