Topic summary
⁠26%2 analyzed articles/videos873 analyzed words
BS Summary: These South Philadelphia results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Halo Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 289 hits. Analysis detected 1,762 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,363 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (10,611 of 16,562 topics). This South Philadelphia is better (less manipulative) than 64.10% of the peer group.
South Philadelphia
Topic details
Total words: 3,363
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510035.9% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.9%3.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos