Topic summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These South Dallas Development results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 66 hits. Analysis detected 397 faulty-reasoning hits from 999 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (4,784 of 23,189 topics). This South Dallas Development is worse (more manipulative) than 79.40% of the peer group.
South Dallas Development
Topic details
Total words: 999
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

79% percentile
025507510079.4% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles999 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 3.6%3.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 5.6%5.6%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 6.6%6.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Horn Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.0%Bandwagon: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos