Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,476 analyzed words
BS Summary: These South Africa Men's National Soccer Team results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hindsight Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.7% saturation with 1,459 hits. Analysis detected 5,058 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,904 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (9,327 of 16,562 topics). This South Africa Men's National Soccer Team is better (less manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group.
South Africa Men's National Soccer Team
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠44%South Africa Men's National Soccer Team (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 5,904
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510043.7% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 24.7%24.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 7.8%7.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 11.9%11.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 24.7%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos