Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,600 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Soul Food results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 1,373 hits. Analysis detected 6,205 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,400 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (8,988 of 16,562 topics). This Soul Food is better (less manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group.
Soul Food
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,400
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510045.7% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 21.4%21.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.0%4.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.8%9.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 21.4%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos