Topic summary
⁠40%1 analyzed article/video2,519 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Soul results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Anecdotal, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 789 hits. Analysis detected 4,634 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,557 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (13,486 of 16,562 topics). This Soul is better (less manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group.
Soul
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,557
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

19% percentile
025507510018.6% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 10.4%10.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos