Topic summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video974 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sophie Cunningham results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31% saturation with 907 hits. Analysis detected 4,568 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,922 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (5,252 of 16,562 topics). This Sophie Cunningham is worse (more manipulative) than 68.30% of the peer group.
Sophie Cunningham
Topic details
Total words: 2,922
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

68% percentile
025507510068.3% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 31.0%31.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.0%8.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.9%16.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.0%9.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.6%14.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.8%10.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 6.4%6.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 31.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Straw Man: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.1%Middle Ground: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos