Topic summary
⁠33%1 analyzed article/video661 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Solar Storms results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 173 hits. Analysis detected 1,566 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,983 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (6,833 of 16,562 topics). This Solar Storms is worse (more manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group.
Solar Storms
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠59%Solar Storms (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,983
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510058.7% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.2%8.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.3%4.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 8.7%8.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.7%4.7%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos