Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,923 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sofia Vergara results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 791 hits. Analysis detected 6,837 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,234 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (9,336 of 16,562 topics). This Sofia Vergara is better (less manipulative) than 56.40% of the peer group.
Sofia Vergara
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,234
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510043.6% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 12.7%12.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 12.2%12.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos