Topic summary
⁠89%2 analyzed articles/videos870 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Social Welfare Programs results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 1,479 hits. Analysis detected 10,853 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,454 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (6,720 of 16,452 topics). This Social Welfare Programs is worse (more manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group.
Social Welfare Programs
Topic details
Total words: 8,454
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510059.2% percentile
3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 17.5%17.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.0%6.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 14.7%14.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.3%14.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.1%13.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.2%8.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Topic 17.5%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos