Topic summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video1,250 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Social Media Impact On Youth results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 362 hits. Analysis detected 2,790 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,750 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (8,759 of 15,887 topics). This Social Media Impact On Youth is better (less manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group.
Social Media Impact On Youth
Topic details
Total words: 3,750
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510044.9% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.7%9.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.1%2.1%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 3.5%3.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos