Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video784 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Social Media Ethics results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21% saturation with 493 hits. Analysis detected 4,295 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,352 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (3,395 of 16,562 topics). This Social Media Ethics is worse (more manipulative) than 79.50% of the peer group.
Social Media Ethics
Topic details
Total words: 2,352
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

80% percentile
025507510079.5% percentile
5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.0%17.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 20.4%20.4%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 6.7%6.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.1%7.1%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 7.1%7.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 12.3%12.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 4.8%4.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.1%5.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 21.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 20.4%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos