Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Social Media Defamation results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Ad Hominem, and Anchoring Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 109 hits. Analysis detected 523 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,996 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 22,664 topics). This Social Media Defamation is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Social Media Defamation
Topic details
Total words: 1,996
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 3.8%3.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos