Topic summary
⁠62%2 analyzed articles/videos829 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Social Media Bans results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Availability Heuristic, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 324 hits. Analysis detected 2,307 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,261 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (8,977 of 15,330 topics). This Social Media Bans is better (less manipulative) than 58.60% of the peer group.
Social Media Bans
Topic details
Total words: 3,261
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510041.4% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.9%9.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.9%5.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos