Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Social Change In Iran results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 621 hits. Analysis detected 4,511 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,311 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,437 topics). This Social Change In Iran is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Social Change In Iran
Topic details
Total words: 4,311
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.4%14.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.9%12.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos