Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,372 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Soccer In The Us results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 401 hits. Analysis detected 3,355 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,488 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (10,735 of 16,562 topics). This Soccer In The Us is better (less manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group.
Soccer In The Us
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,488
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510035.2% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.3%7.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.3%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos