Topic summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video1,042 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Soccer Analysis results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Halo Effect, and Anchoring Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 630 hits. Analysis detected 2,702 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,168 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (9,648 of 16,562 topics). This Soccer Analysis is better (less manipulative) than 58.30% of the peer group.
Soccer Analysis
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,168
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510041.7% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.1%15.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 9.8%9.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Horn Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.0%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos