Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,220 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sober Living Facilities results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Horn Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 46.1% saturation with 1,685 hits. Analysis detected 6,982 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,657 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (3,816 of 16,562 topics). This Sober Living Facilities is worse (more manipulative) than 77.00% of the peer group.
Sober Living Facilities
Topic details
Total words: 3,657
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

77% percentile
025507510077.0% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 46.1%46.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 30.7%30.7%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 12.2%12.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.5%10.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.7%5.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 46.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 30.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 15.9%Horn Effect: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 1.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos