Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Sober Living results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Hasty Generalization, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 218 hits. Analysis detected 1,810 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,817 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,650 topics). This Sober Living is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Sober Living
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,817
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 7.7%7.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.0%1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.6%6.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.6%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Composition/Division: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos