Topic summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video780 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Smashing Pumpkins results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Anecdotal, and In-Group Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.2% saturation with 880 hits. Analysis detected 2,457 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,120 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (7,070 of 22,953 topics). This Smashing Pumpkins is worse (more manipulative) than 69.20% of the peer group.
Smashing Pumpkins
Topic details
Total words: 3,120
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

69% percentile
025507510069.2% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 28.2%28.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.5%5.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 28.2%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.6%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos