Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Smartphone Industry results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Hindsight Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 344 hits. Analysis detected 3,231 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,204 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,559 topics). This Smartphone Industry is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Smartphone Industry
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Smartphone Industry (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 3,204
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.7%10.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 7.1%7.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.6%10.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.0%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos