Topic summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video158 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Smart Tvs results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 26.6% saturation with 126 hits. Analysis detected 611 faulty-reasoning hits from 474 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (918 of 15,447 topics). This Smart Tvs is worse (more manipulative) than 94.10% of the peer group.
Smart Tvs
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 474
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

94% percentile
025507510094.1% percentile
11.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles474 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 26.6%26.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.9%9.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 23.4%23.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 9.5%9.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.3%13.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.3%14.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 9.3%9.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 8.7%8.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 26.6%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 23.4%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos