Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video87 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Smart Tv Apps results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Status Quo Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 60.2% saturation with 157 hits. Analysis detected 402 faulty-reasoning hits from 261 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠98% (373 of 16,562 topics). This Smart Tv Apps is worse (more manipulative) than 97.80% of the peer group.
Smart Tv Apps
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 261
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

98% percentile
025507510097.8% percentile
17.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles261 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 60.1%60.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 28.7%28.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 18.8%18.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 13.4%13.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 11.1%11.1%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.5%6.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 60.1%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 28.7%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 18.8%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 4.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 0.9%Bandwagon: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos