Topic summary
⁠48%2 analyzed articles/videos870 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Smart Speakers And Displays results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 352 hits. Analysis detected 2,745 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,228 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (7,305 of 16,562 topics). This Smart Speakers And Displays is worse (more manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group.
Smart Speakers And Displays
Topic details
Total words: 3,228
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510055.9% percentile
3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 10.9%10.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.6%6.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.7%10.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos