Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video428 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Skateboarding results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hindsight Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 318 hits. Analysis detected 1,759 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,712 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 59% (6,851 of 16,562 topics). This Skateboarding is worse (more manipulative) than 58.60% of the peer group.
Skateboarding
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,712
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510058.6% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.0%5.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 18.6%18.6%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 10.5%10.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 13.1%13.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Composition/Division: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos