Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 428 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Skateboarding results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hindsight Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 318 hits . Analysis detected 1,759 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,712 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 59% (6,851 of 16,562 topics). This Skateboarding is worse (more manipulative) than 58.60% of the peer group. Skateboarding
Topic details
Total words: 1,712
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.6% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 18.6% 18.6% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 10.5% 10.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 13.1% 13.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Hindsight Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Composition/Division: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.2% False Dilemma: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst