Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Single Sex Spaces results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 46.7% saturation with 772 hits. Analysis detected 3,594 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,654 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Single Sex Spaces is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Single Sex Spaces
Topic details
Total words: 1,654
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 46.7%46.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 38.3%38.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 24.1%24.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 20.1%20.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 8.5%8.5%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.0%6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 7.3%7.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.2%12.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 46.7%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 38.3%, sitewide 1.4%Framing Effect: Topic 20.1%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 24.1%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 3.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Horn Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos