Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,252 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sinaloa Cartel results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 527 hits. Analysis detected 3,030 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,008 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (12,609 of 16,562 topics). This Sinaloa Cartel is better (less manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group.
Sinaloa Cartel
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,008
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510023.9% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos