Topic summary
⁠25%1 analyzed article/video978 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ship Salvage results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias, Halo Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 190 hits. Analysis detected 1,320 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,934 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (13,423 of 16,562 topics). This Ship Salvage is better (less manipulative) than 81.00% of the peer group.
Ship Salvage
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠19%Ship Salvage (selected)2%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,934
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

19% percentile
025507510019.0% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 6.1%6.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.3%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos