Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video878 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sherrone Moore Scandal results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 32.1% saturation with 842 hits. Analysis detected 3,982 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,623 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (2,931 of 16,562 topics). This Sherrone Moore Scandal is worse (more manipulative) than 82.30% of the peer group.
Sherrone Moore Scandal
Topic details
Total words: 2,623
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

82% percentile
025507510082.3% percentile
6.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 32.1%32.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 9.4%9.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 7.4%7.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 21.7%21.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.0%10.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 5.4%5.4%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 3.7%3.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 32.1%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 21.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 6.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos