Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Shark Attack results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Unattributed Quote, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 74 hits. Analysis detected 411 faulty-reasoning hits from 609 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,966 topics). This Shark Attack is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Shark Attack
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 609
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles609 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.5%3.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 8.4%8.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.9%6.9%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.2%9.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 8.1%8.1%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 12.2%12.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos