Topic summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video1,394 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shareholder Lawsuit results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 1,259 hits. Analysis detected 8,741 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,576 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (4,994 of 16,562 topics). This Shareholder Lawsuit is worse (more manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group.
Shareholder Lawsuit
Topic details
Total words: 5,576
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510069.9% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 19.1%19.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 12.2%12.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 8.7%8.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 13.3%13.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 22.6%22.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 22.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Begging the Question: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos