Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 640 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sextortion results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Hindsight Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 41.5% saturation with 797 hits . Analysis detected 5,149 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,920 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.9% and a BS Rank of 91% (1,567 of 16,562 topics). This Sextortion is worse (more manipulative) than 90.50% of the peer group. Sextortion
Topic details
Total words: 1,920
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
91% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.5% percentile 8.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 41.5% 41.5% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 22.3% 22.3% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Topic 17.6% 17.6% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Topic 12.7% 12.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 14.8% 14.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 27.0% 27.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 14.2% 14.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 17.1% 17.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 15.3% 15.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Topic 41.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 27.0%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Topic 24.2%, sitewide 26.9% Hindsight Bias: Topic 22.3%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 2.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 14.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 3.7% Red Herring: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 0.7% Availability Heuristic: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Special Pleading: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst