Topic summary
43%2 analyzed articles/videos487 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sex Work results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 476 hits. Analysis detected 4,992 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,353 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 49% (8,598 of 16,562 topics). This Sex Work is better (less manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group.
Sex Work
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,353
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510048.1% percentile
2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.8%10.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.7%7.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.7%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos