Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video706 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sex Trafficking Cases results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.5% saturation with 562 hits. Analysis detected 2,521 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,118 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (4,718 of 16,562 topics). This Sex Trafficking Cases is worse (more manipulative) than 71.50% of the peer group.
Sex Trafficking Cases
Topic details
Total words: 2,118
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510071.5% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.2%16.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 26.5%26.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.1%9.1%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 6.6%6.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 11.3%11.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 26.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Red Herring: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 0.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Horn Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.0%Straw Man: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos