Topic summary
36% 1 analyzed article/video 708 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sex Offenses results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 350 hits . Analysis detected 1,639 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,124 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 63% (6,195 of 16,562 topics). This Sex Offenses is worse (more manipulative) than 62.60% of the peer group. Sex Offenses
Topic details
Total words: 2,124
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.6% percentile 3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 16.5% 16.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 10.3% 10.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Horn Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Red Herring: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst