Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Sex Discrimination results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 273 hits . Analysis detected 2,319 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,148 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Sex Discrimination is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Sex Discrimination
Topic details
Total words: 2,148
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 5.9% 5.9% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 12.7% 12.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.8% Ad Hominem: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Horn Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.0% Red Herring: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Burden of Proof: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.4% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst