Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 636 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sevastopol results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 312 hits . Analysis detected 951 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,544 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 35% (10,485 of 15,944 topics). This Sevastopol is better (less manipulative) than 65.80% of the peer group. Sevastopol
Topic details
Total words: 2,544
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.2% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 12.3% 12.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst