Topic summary
⁠1%1 analyzed article/video346 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Septa results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Sunk Cost Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 3.1% saturation with 43 hits. Analysis detected 167 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,384 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (18,847 of 23,418 topics). This Septa is better (less manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group.
Septa
Topic details
Total words: 1,384
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

20% percentile
025507510019.5% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.0%2.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Topic 2.1%2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 2.1%2.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.3%Indoctrination: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos