Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,524 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Control results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Pessimism Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.2% saturation with 1,106 hits. Analysis detected 6,110 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,572 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (5,132 of 16,562 topics). This Senate Control is worse (more manipulative) than 69.00% of the peer group.
Senate Control
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,572
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

69% percentile
025507510069.0% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 24.2%24.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.3%14.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 13.2%13.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.8%8.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 24.2%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.6%Horn Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos