Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Self Driving Technology results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 459 hits. Analysis detected 2,554 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,397 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Self Driving Technology is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Self Driving Technology
Topic details
Total words: 2,397
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 19.1%19.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.5%3.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 4.7%4.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Straw Man: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos