Topic summary
⁠80%2 analyzed articles/videos1,344 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Self Defense Laws results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 758 hits. Analysis detected 5,684 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,032 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (5,423 of 16,562 topics). This Self Defense Laws is worse (more manipulative) than 67.30% of the peer group.
Self Defense Laws
Topic details
Total words: 4,032
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510067.3% percentile
4.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 18.8%18.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.3%17.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.5%13.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 7.4%7.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.7%12.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.6%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos