Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video999 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seinfeld results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 885 hits. Analysis detected 5,286 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,996 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,712 of 16,562 topics). This Seinfeld is worse (more manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group.
Seinfeld
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠66%Seinfeld (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,996
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510065.5% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 22.1%22.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 16.3%16.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 22.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.9%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.4%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos

Hugging and Learning⁠47%
Slate Magazine⁠69%By Sam Adams⁠26%6/26/2026, 2:45:00 AM