Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video724 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Security Operation results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 25.3% saturation with 732 hits. Analysis detected 3,499 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,896 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (5,975 of 16,562 topics). This Security Operation is worse (more manipulative) than 63.90% of the peer group.
Security Operation
Topic details
Total words: 2,896
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510063.9% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.3%13.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 12.6%12.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 6.3%6.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 25.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 8.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos