Topic summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video204 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Security Alliances & Partnerships results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 118 hits. Analysis detected 1,254 faulty-reasoning hits from 612 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (1,335 of 15,769 topics). This Security Alliances & Partnerships is worse (more manipulative) than 91.50% of the peer group.
Security Alliances & Partnerships
Topic details
Total words: 612
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

92% percentile
025507510091.5% percentile
9.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles612 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 16.5%16.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 19.3%19.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 12.8%12.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.2%17.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 17.3%17.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 17.3%17.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.1%11.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.8%7.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 7.0%7.0%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.3%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 8.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 11.1%Recency Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 2.7%Halo Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.0%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.7%No True Scotsman: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos